Open Borders & Mass Immigration: The Trojan Horse to Biological Prosperity


In terms of physics, the second law of thermodynamics illustrates the tendency of organisms and complete, complex systems to degrade, decay and degenerate over time, in a phenomenon called entropy. In philosophical observations, this process might also be observed in societal tendencies, E.G. the eventual collapse of prominent civilizations, like the fall of Rome and Greece. The inherent, instinctual response to entropy is to develop immunities to environmental susceptibilities, to delay the phenomenon, increase the quality of life, and secure prosperity for future generations. Actions contrary to this endeavor are internally destructive and counter productive to the preservation of organisms (from a biological perspective) and to the protection of societies (from a sociological one).

Extending this scientific observation to a political perspective grants us the ability to objectively observe the inherent detriments of one particular ideology- that of liberalism. The integration of a foreign species into a native population, and the subsequent invasion, results in the inevitable destruction of the native species.

One example of this is the proliferation of the Snakehead fish within the United States, originally indigenous to numerous countries in Africa and Asia. This monstrous fish deemed the title “Frankenfish” due to both its tendency to grow up to 18 lbs and 3 feet long, as well as its abnormal evolutionary ability to walk on terrestrial landscapes, is now considered an injurious species as it has infested the Potomac river with an estimated 22,000 organisms spanning 120 miles. A crucial detail to note is that the species were originally introduced legally; the introduction of the species into new habitats in the U.S. wasn’t prohibited until the problem had already become prominent, and biologists currently struggle to contain it.

In biology, this is an invasive species.

In history, similar sociological invasions are what caused great empires to fall, like the Roman Empire did to consistent Germanic invasion.

In Liberalism, it’s considered equality.

To the liberal, the notion of “equality” is the acceptance of a sociological eutrophication. In biology, this process is defined by an eventual degeneration of a habitat due to the overproduction of organic matter. In terms of society, we could consider this overpopulation, hence the unsustainable reproductive rate of many particularly destitute countries in Africa and the Middle East, like Nigeria and Yemen. The liberal solution? Accept unprecedented quantities of immigrants from uncivilized countries with a lack of basic healthcare, sanitation, and governmental structure, into major civilized and industrialized countries. The most impoverished and destitute countries are, coincidentally, the ones with the highest reproductive rate.

But what is the result of this liberal “solution?” In biology, such a phenomenon creates large dead zones, incapable of sustaining life. In politics, such hazardous areas are synonymous with “No-Go zones,” or previously civilized areas now destabilized by rambunctious aliens that have driven away residents. The occurrence is now so frequent in areas plagued by immigrants that apps have been designed to warn citizens of areas that are unsafe due to violence and crime. Users receive notifications whenever an occurrence of assault, theft, sexual harassment or “incivility”(Insurrection) occurs.

The development of modern medication, vaccinations, sanitation, healthcare and general civilization are all methods developed to effectively hinder the process of entropy, and has thus differentiated major industrialized countries from destitute countries with a lack of resources. This drastic observation between major industrialized and educated nations, and impoverished, anarchic countries entrapped within destitute conditions, illustrates the difference between citizens of the most probable intellectual aptitude, and others who lack self sufficiency for even the most basic necessities, let alone the societal luxuries of industrialization and education.

The process by which organisms of the same species are geographically separated and thus develop genetic and behavioral differences respective to their habitats, or Allopatric Speciation, is also an explanation for the drastic differences in terms of the cultural, behavioral, and intellectual variations between civilized, industrialized nations and destitute ones. Demographics demonstrating these evident differences are best maintained separately from one another- ironically, this is the literal definition of “diversity”; however, the liberal definition of diversity is entirely different-it is actually the destruction of demographics by forcing them to assimilate under the guise of “multiculturalism.”

The ideal utopias of liberalism are, quite literally, the biological destruction of industrialized countries and distinct demographics. True diversity can only be preserved through the separate existences of demographics, and those demographics can only exist distinctly from one another if they remain separate. Multiculturalism is the destruction of biological and intellectual diversity. Open borders are not “tolerance and acceptance.” It is, quite literally, an invasion that serves as a catalyst for our biological and sociological destruction.

Therefore, it logically follows that national security is a necessity to the preservation of any nation, and cultural coherence is maintained by providing economic incentives to its citizens to become self sufficient members of society. Immigration is not for all. Meritocracy is for the ambitious. America must adopt meritocratic values in order to preserve herself, and not entertain the Trojan horse of mass immigration.


  1. In history numerous civilizations have risen and fallen. Athens, Rome, Ottoman and the AustroHungarian spring to mind. Almost cyclical in nature. Is it a forgone conclusion that societies, when they reach a point that, similar to ‘critical mass’, will inexorably fall. Are there any examples in history, that you are aware of, where this trend has been arrested?
    More specifically, in relation to your article, has a ‘quiet invasion’ ever succeeded before?

    • The trend seems to be consistent throughout history. Can you elaborate upon what you mean in the context of a quiet invasion? Are you referring to a more subtle form of invasion through mass immigration? If so, I would argue that we are witnessing the success of that tactic at the very moment in Europe, due to the extensively detrimental effects it is having upon the civilian population who are no longer safe in their native lands.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here